Now, the network ABSTRACT tools have become an important tool for Internet users who, I most often use is del.icio.us, feeling pretty good. Domestic and telecommunications networks Abstract 365key and is said to have done quite good, but I have not tried. I use del.icio.us on experience, the largest of its usefulness for me there are two points, the core of the collection and sharing.
1) record their daily reading, you can share with others, but also easy to stage their own conclusion.
2) through a common collection of users, find people with similar interests and their own.
I am not accustomed to using it to organize my bookmarks. I basically use the fixed line machine, use the browser's bookmarks, I only need to: (1) Open "Bookmarks" menu; (2) Click on the bookmark. But if you use del.icio.us, I need to: (1) First entry to my home page on it (sometimes even log); (2) and then select a particular tag; (3) and then click one of the collection, I can finally enter into the page. Clearly, the use del.icio.us I used a multi-step. As a frequently used function, your convenience is the number one, huh, huh.
My del.icio.us conclusion is that it is a collection / sharing of information a good tool, but not a management tool for knowledge. Of course, the people is designed to not have been used to manage knowledge, my conclusion is proof of the del.icio.us product design is successful.
But I need a tool for knowledge management. How can more effectively organize their own information, this is actually something worth pondering, especially for research people. I used to approach may be soil, but over time has also been used. Specifically as follows.
1, according to their interests, different categories of the establishment of a number of directories. Categories as detailed a number of points, so you can make directory hierarchy remain at the level of the directory hierarchy to avoid more complicated operation brought. I will only really interested in their own data collection, the temporary excitement of the thing, I will put a cool cool Temp directory, to be sure there is a need for a directory, I then copy them to the past. Facts have proved that a person can continue to maintain the attention of the classification number in fact very small. Continuing concern to go before we can sort out a number of contexts, found "really they are useful" things. Other occasionally exciting but something saved, when in fact the need to look at google or baidu, can be found quickly.
2, inside a directory for each file, I will write an index. I will give each file number, and simply write a description, such as "Help to build a recommendation system, the key technologies available." In addition, natural and ultimately, to extract keywords, papers to write more, have been more handy summary of the keyword. File description must be short, but said the most important benefit skim the surface of the visit; have too many keywords, helps to retrieve. Thus, the need to find information, I quickly had my description text can also search for keywords. google and baidu just launched the desktop search tool, I was very excited that you can use it to facilitate retrieval of relevant information. But after the trial had, I feel more disappointed. I need a feature, I selected a directory for indexing and retrieval, they do not. I do not need me to index the entire hard drive data, I simply do not have access, also in vain take up my hard drive space, my book is only 40G hard drive, high cost of land ah.
Of course, after all, earth way, other just fine, but he's the most inconvenient thing is: I have not found an effective way to keep track of the contents of these files - that is, knowledge - relationships. Aggregate keyword alone is not enough. Relationship similar to the paper I mentioned in the citation, I need to quickly locate a file in the quoted part, and not to link to this file on the matter. Of course, even the link to the file has not been resolved satisfactorily, even more directly targeted to the content to wish for.
Extended use of semantic web technology tools web Abstract should be one of the ways to achieve this goal. Implementation method and is now similar to the popular Tag, but the Tag is predefined. In order to be able to, and now Tag distinction below, I named this Tag Knowledge Tag, KTag. You can use the language like RDF to describe KTag, making it the expression of relations and have the ability to reason. Difficult to achieve initial surely there are two.
1, Standard KTag definition. Can refer to existing standards already have some, but not much. Also can start their slow accumulation, as now del.icio.us this way, when you add Tag, I suggest you the most common Tag, guide users to the gradual harmonization of the use of Tag. But no matter what method used, the background of the workload is considerable.
2, how to guide the user to correctly tag KTag. And now the biggest difference between Tag, KTag ultimately need to label the contents, but not only for the entire article. This provides the user with trouble, as I said more and browser favorites, like del.icio.us, ease of use is the determining factor, unless the Target User defined I do - and are willing to pay extra effort to knowledge for management effectiveness and efficiency. In short, the user experience is definitely a problem.
没有评论:
发表评论